dhadbeenpubliclyregnised

asthe``viceregentsofchristupoh.noone

questioherightofgodtorulethe.

asanaturalresult,feuredtodoubttherightofthe

divine``viethingandtodendthe

obedienassesbecausehehedirectrepresentative

oftheabsoluteruleroftheuniverseandresponsible

onlytoalghtygod.

ationprovedsuessful,those

rightserlyhadbeeedinthepapacywere

takehenyeuropeansnse

protestants.asheadoftheiroionalordynastic

hestheyinsisteduponbeing``eregents

itoftheiroerritory.thepeopledidnotquestion

therightoftheirrulerstotakesuchastep.theyaepted

it,justastheideaofarepresentative

systetheonlyreasonableandjust

fovent.itisunfairthereforetostatethateither

lutheranisrcalvinisausedtheparticularfeelingof

irritationessoftandloudlyrepeated

assertionofhis``divineright.theresthavebeenother

groundsfenuineenglishdisbeliefinthedivineright

ofkings.

thefirstpositivedenialofthe``divinerightofsns